Darcy-Level Brooding vs. Just Being a Jerk: A Master Class in the Difference

Because apparently, some authors think these are the same thing. Spoiler alert: they're not.

Welcome Back to Epic Darcy Fails!

Today we're tackling the age-old confusion that's plaguing romance novels everywhere: the mysterious case of authors who think "brooding" and "being a complete psychopath with abs" are synonymous.

Newsflash: Mr. Darcy was brooding. Your MMC who burns down her village because she smiled at the baker? That's not brooding, honey. That's a therapy bill waiting to happen.

As a fantasy romance author who's written her fair share of alpha males (some of whom have definitely crossed into jerk territory), I feel uniquely qualified to explain the difference. Consider this my public service announcement.

The Darcy Standard: What Real Brooding Looks Like

True Darcy-Level Brooding:

• Stares pensively out windows while contemplating his inadequacies

• Suffers in silence because he believes she deserves better

• Writes anguished letters at 3 AM that he never sends

• Rescues her reputation while expecting nothing in return

• Accepts rejection like a gentleman (even if it kills him inside)

The Darcy Formula: Internal torment + external restraint + ultimate respect = Swoon-worthy brooding

The Jerk Masquerading as "Brooding": A Field Guide

The "Possessive Protection" Jerk

What Darcy Would Do: Quietly ensures she's safe from a distance. Maybe has a word with Wickham. Respects her choices even when they terrify him.

What Your Alpha Jerk Does:

• Locks her in a tower "for her own protection"

• Murders anyone who looks at her twice (including the elderly baker who complimented her bread selection)

• Brands his initials into her arm because "now everyone will know you're mine"

• Destroys entire kingdoms because she mentioned missing her hometown

• His logic: "I killed 47 people today, but it's fine because I love you!"

The "Emotional Constipation" Jerk

What Darcy Would Do: Struggles to express feelings but treats her with unfailing courtesy. His worst crime is being awkwardly formal.

What Your Alpha Jerk Does:

• Communicates exclusively through grunts and property destruction

• Throws furniture when she asks about his feelings

• Burns down the library because books have "too many emotions"

• Responds to "How was your day?" by executing his entire staff

• His excuse: "I don't do feelings, woman! Now come here so I can brood at you menacingly!"

The "Tragic Past" Jerk

What Darcy Would Do: Lets his past inform his caution but doesn't use it to justify hurting others. Works through his issues like a functional adult.

What Your Alpha Jerk Does:

• Uses his tragic backstory to justify literally everything

• "Sorry I sacrificed your best friend to a demon, but my father didn't hug me enough"

• Starts wars because someone reminded him of his childhood trauma

• Expects her to fix his psychological damage through the power of love and excellent cleavage

• His therapy: "I had a bad childhood, so now I get to make everyone else's life miserable!"

The "I Know What's Best" Jerk

What Darcy Would Do: Offers advice when asked. Respects her intelligence and decision-making abilities. Steps back when told to.

What Your Alpha Jerk Does:

• Makes all her decisions because "little brain can't handle big thoughts"

• Sells her sister into slavery because "she was a bad influence"

• Destroys her magical powers because "magic is dangerous for delicate females"

• Chooses her outfits, meals, and thoughts because "I know you better than you know yourself"

• His justification: "I'm 800 years old and have seen things. Trust me, I know better."

Real Examples: The Contrast is STARK

Scenario: She wants to visit her family

Darcy-Level Response: "While I would prefer you remain close for selfish reasons, I understand your family's importance to you. Allow me to arrange safe passage and write to ensure you're welcomed properly."

Alpha Jerk Response: Razes her entire hometown to the ground, then presents her with the ashes: "Problem solved! Now you don't have to choose between me and them!"

Scenario: Another man shows interest in her

Darcy-Level Response: Withdraws with wounded dignity. Maybe writes an angsty letter he never sends. Ultimately wishes her happiness even if it destroys him.

Alpha Jerk Response: Challenges the man to a death match, wins, then wears his head as a hat to the next court gathering. "What? I was being subtle!"

Scenario: She disagrees with his decision

Darcy-Level Response: "I confess your perspective had not occurred to me. Perhaps we might discuss this further, as your counsel has proven invaluable in the past."

Alpha Jerk Response: Burns down three villages and a small country. "This is what happens when you question me! But I still love you, baby!"

The "But He's Hot" Defense

Look, I get it. I've written the possessive dragon king who thinks kidnapping equals courtship. I've crafted the immortal warrior who solves relationship problems with strategic violence. But here's the thing: we can acknowledge they're attractive disasters while still calling them what they are.

Hot Jerk Checklist:

• Does he solve emotional problems with murder? ✓ Jerk

• Has he ever said "I did it for us" after committing genocide? ✓ Jerk

• Does his idea of compromise involve "only" killing half her enemies? ✓ Still a jerk

• Is his love language arson? ✓ Definitely a jerk

• 
  

The Author's Confession Corner

Raises hand Hi, I'm LiAnne, and I've written jerks who think they're Darcy.

I once wrote a character who thought the appropriate response to his love interest being kidnapped was to burn down seven kingdoms and salt the earth so nothing would ever grow again. His logic? "If I can't have nice things, no one can!"

Was he hot? Absolutely. Was he brooding? Sure. Was he completely unhinged? Also yes.

The difference? I didn't pretend he was a misunderstood romantic hero. He was a gorgeous disaster with the emotional regulation skills of a toddler having a meltdown in the cereal aisle.

The Bottom Line for Fellow Fantasy Authors

Your 900-year-old dragon shifter can be possessive, protective, and even a little unhinged. Just don't call him "misunderstood" when he responds to relationship conflicts by ending civilizations.

Darcy was proud and emotionally constipated, but his worst crime was a poorly worded proposal. Your MMC's worst crime shouldn't be actual war crimes.

There's a difference between:

• "I cannot express my feelings properly" (Darcy)

• "I express my feelings through strategic genocide" (Your fantasy alpha)

Both can be swoon-worthy in their own way, but let's not pretend they're the same level of problematic.

Your Turn, Fellow Disaster Authors!

Confess your sins in the comments! What's the most unhinged thing your "romantic" MMC has done in the name of love? Let's create a support group for authors who've accidentally written attractive sociopaths.

Remember: You can write a hot mess. Just don't call him Mr. Darcy.

Next week: "The Darcy Apology vs. The 'Sorry You're Upset' Non-Apology" because apparently, some MMCs think acknowledging feelings is a weakness. Spoiler: Darcy disagrees.

Happy writing (and may your alphas be slightly less murdery),

LiAnne Kay

Want more brutal honesty about our questionable fictional men? Subscribe to my newsletter where I continue roasting characters who think genocide is a love language.